2014-15 SWAC Basketball Preview: Alabama State, Texas Southern lead the way

TigerFans

Administrator
Staff member
SVRXKKLWSSDBGKV.20140315235320.jpg


To say the least, the 2013-14 season was a difficult one for the SWAC. While the league had a clear regular season champion in Southern, the Jaguars were ineligible for postseason play thanks to low APR scores. That would be the case for three other SWAC programs as well, with those teams allowed to participate in the conference tournament. Ultimately Mike Davis’ Texas Southern Tigers, who were picked by some to win the regular season title, earned the NCAA tournament bid with well-traveled big man Aaric Murray leading the way.

Leading scorers Murray and D’Aris Scarver have moved on, which means that Davis has some significant holes to fill in order to lead Texas Southern back to the NCAA tournament. Davis welcomes back senior forward Jose Rodriguez while reloading with transfers. Nick Shepard (Long Beach State) and Nevin Johnson (Creighton) are ready to go while point guard Deverell Biggs (Nebraska) will be eligible at end of the fall semester. Will the “second chance” route once again work for Texas Southern? If it does, the Tigers will have the talent needed to win the SWAC automatic bid.

Even with those additions, however, Texas Southern likely won’t be the favorite to win the SWAC. That label will be affixed to Alabama State, with head coach Lewis Jackson welcoming back his top five scorers, led by guards Jamel Waters (14.1 ppg, 6.1 apg) and DeMarcus Robinson (11.5 ppg). What makes this more amazing is the fact that the Hornets are one of two SWAC teams ineligible for postseason play (Southern’s the other), and for many programs that marks the start of a mass exodus. With that not being the case for Alabama State, they’re more can capable of earning the SWAC regular season title.

Read the rest: http://collegebasketballtalk.nbcsports.com/2014/10/11/2014-15-swac-preview/
 
TigerFans said:

Better review, but winning the SWAC Tourney is more relevant than winning the conference.  Everybody only remembers who punched a ticket and won the tourney, not who won the conference. With that said once again, Alabama State should've been unranked since they're ineligible and Alabama State was super irrelevant last year ... It was all about TSU, SU, and PV.   I think history will repeat itself 
 
Back
Top